|
Design competition photovoltaic products for the built environment Press release |
home
> publications
> press
releases > Last updated: 1 January 2001 |
An international competition to design PV products for use in the built environment has just concluded. The competition demonstrated the wide range of approaches possible for integrating photovoltaics in our built environment. Entries were received from architects, engineers, designers and students from 10 countries demonstrating a variety of cost-effective, practical and elegant designs. The prize giving ceremony was held at the 16th European PV conference held in Glasgow, 1-5 May 2000 where a total of 7000 Euro was awarded to the various prize winners.
Robert Webb of Robert Webb Associates, UK, won 1500 Euro as the overall competition winner for his design for PV panels as a ventilated rainscreen system over a lightweight stressed-skin timber construction. The judges admired the overall concept for the building and its consideration for environmental and passive solar issues in addition to electrical generation.
The reasoning behind the competition was the belief that photovoltaics have the potential to supply a significant part of our electricity requirements and will become increasingly visible in the built environment in the future. As a quiet, clean and low maintenance renewable energy generator PV can be easily embedded into the urban fabric in a way that avoids the unnecessary use of undeveloped land. The competition therefore aimed to encourage the design of well-integrated and well-designed PV products for the Built Environment. The underlying principle being that integrating PV in the built environment should enhance that environment, rather than detract from it.
Products submitted to the competition had to either incorporate photovoltaics or provide a method of incorporating photovoltaics into a structure in the built environment. This concept had to form a significant part of the design alongside the issues of enhancing the built environment whilst demonstrating that PV can contribute to electricity demands and CO2 reduction (in this context). For the purpose of this competition the built environment referred to buildings and other fixed structures that one would expect to find in a built environment.
A team from Halle 58 Architekten, in Switzerland won the exhibition prize of 1000 Euro for their superbly presented design of a Solarsail. This prize was awarded on the basis of the number of votes given to the entry by visitors to the exhibition of short-listed designs held at the 16th European PV conference held in Glasgow, 1-5 May 2000. All the short listed entries had been exhibited at the conference and visitors to the exhibition were invited to vote on their favourite design.
Winning designs were also announced for the four categories: roofing products, façade products, other building products and recently released products.
Roofing Products
Andrew Weight from Reading University, UK was the overall student winner and the winner of the roofing products category. He was awarded 1500 Euro for his PhotoFIT design. This design for mounting PV modules to provide a roof or façade covering used an innovative profile system as the module frame. It aimed to minimise costs by simplifying installation requirements in terms of components, complexity and time. The judges considered it to be a well-presented and well thought through entry, giving good consideration to the integration of cabling and avoiding the problem of the frame shadowing the module.
Façade Products
The façades category prize of 1500 Euro was shared between Marcel Ferrier, an architect from Switzerland and a team of three students (S. Tomatsuri, K. Kondo and T. Ohashi) from Hosei University, Japan. Marcel's design was for a PV façade on a circular building that addressed the issue of the sun's movement in an innovative manner. The Japanese design was for building with a PV roof and façade with water flowing over the module surfaces. The combination of PV and water-cooling systems aimed to keep the building and PV installation cool. A design for Glass-glass triangular PV modules (right) by Rogelio Leal Cueva and Tomas Markvart of the University of Southampton, UK was commended as an attractive design, well thought through and well presented.
Other Building Products
A practical and sturdy design for a PV Sunshade system (left) that both optimised solar gain and avoided self-shading won 1500 Euro for the other building products category. D. Hewitt and R. Braunstein of Kawneer Co. in the USA submitted the design. M Margaroli an architect from the UK was commended for his elegant SHADOPHOTOVOLTAIC design, which is a refinement in PV louver systems, although the judges expressed some concern regarding the system's robustness.
Recently Released Products
The recently released products short listed were all roofing products, and included systems to fit onto sloped roofs, PV roof tile systems and systems for mounting PV modules on flat roofs. They were all well developed designs providing cost effective and practical methods of mounting PV on a wide range of roof types. A team from Econergy International in the Netherlands was the category winner with their INTERSOLE design that allows a range of module types and sizes to be integrated into any type of tiled roof in a weatherproof manner. The judges commented that this was a practical system likely to be good value for money.
Notes for editors
| Marks | Judging criteria |
| 10 | Visually attractive |
| 10 | Integration into the built environment. The product should fit well in the context for which it is intended |
| 10 | Functional - the product should meet whatever function the type of product is expected to provide |
| 10 | There must be an identifiable market for the product (it is not the size of the market that counts) |
| 10 | The product should be innovative in some respect. This may involve innovative components, the assembly of the components or the application |
| 5 | The product should be reasonably simple to install, maintain and operate, where applicable |
| 5 | The performance/efficiency of the product is important. Thermal outputs can be considered as well as electrical outputs where appropriate. Demonstrate issues such as ventilation and shading have been considered to maximize output from the chosen PV technology |
| 5 | Practical and cost effective manufacturing method |
| 5 | Environmental issues. Demonstrate that environmental issues have been considered, including minimising: the energy payback of the system and the use of materials harmful to the environment |
| 5 | Flexibility/versatility of the design (able to use in various locations/orientations/markets, etc.) |